14 World Famous Photos throughout history and their stories

Take a break from watching TV....and check famous pictures that change humankind or depict human emotion or just simply famous (like the bliss picture below).


 Afghan Girl [1984]
Photographer: Steve McCurry 
Sharbat Gula was one of the students in an informal school within the refugee camp; McCurry, rarely given the opportunity to photograph Afghan women, seized the opportunity and captured her image. She was approximately 12 years old at the time. She made it on the cover of National Geographic next year, and her identity was discovered in 1992


 Fires at Melborough Street On July 22, 1975 - Boston Herald
Photographer: Stanley J. Forman

A young woman, Diana Bryant, and a very young girl, Tiare Jones fell helplessly. Diana Bryant was pronounced dead at the scene. The young girl lived. Despite a heroic effort, the fireman who tried to grab them had been just seconds away from saving the lives of both. 


Stricken child crawling towards a food camp [1994]
Photographer: Kevin Carter
The photo is the “Pulitzer Prize” winning photo taken in 1994 during the Sudan Famine.
The picture depicts stricken child crawling towards an United Nations food camp, located a kilometer away.
The vulture is waiting for the child to die so that it can eat him. This picture shocked the whole world. No one knows what happened to the child, including the photographer Kevin Carter who left the place as soon as the photograph was taken.
Three months later he committed suicide due to depression.


 Omayra Sánchez [1985]
Photographer: Frank Fournier
 Omayra Sánchez was one of the 25,000 victims of the Nevado del Ruiz (Colombia) volcano which erupted on November 14, 1985. The 13-year old had been trapped in water and concrete for 3 days. The picture was taken shortly before she died . Just like Kevin Carter in Sudanese famine picture, the photographer who took this pic was heavily criticized.


Burning Monk – The Self-Immolation [1963]
Photographer: Malcolm Browne
June 11, 1963, Thich Quang Duc, a Buddhist monk from Vietnam, burned himself to death at a busy intersection in downtown Saigon to bring attention to the repressive policies of the Catholic Diem regime that controlled the South Vietnamese government at the time. Buddhist monks asked the regime to lift its ban on flying the traditional Buddhist flag, to grant Buddhism the same rights as Catholicism, to stop detaining Buddhists and to give Buddhist monks and nuns the right to practice and spread their religion.
While burning Thich Quang Duc never moved a muscle.


The plight of Kosovo refugees [1999]
Photographer: Carol Guzy
The photo is part of The Washington Post’s Pulitzer Prize-winning entry (2000) showing how a Kosovar refugee Agim Shala, 2, is passed through a barbed wire fence into the hands of grandparents at a camp run by United Arab Emirates in Kukes, Albania. The members of the Shala family were reunited here after fleeing the conflict in Kosovo.


Segregated Water Fountains [1950]
Photographer: Elliott Erwitt, Magnum Photos
Picture of segregated water fountains in North Carolina taken by Elliott Erwitt.

Lunch Atop a Skyscaper [1932]
 Photographer: Charles C. Ebbets
The photograph depicts 11 men eating lunch, seated on a girder with their feet dangling hundreds of feet above the New York streets. Ebbets took the photo on September 29, 1932, and it appeared in the New York Herald Tribute in its Sunday photo supplement on October 2.


 The Triangle Shirtwaist Fire [1911]
Photographer: International Ladies Garmet workers Union
Picture of bodies at the Triangle Shirtwaist Company. Company rules were to keep doors closed to the factory so workers (mostly immigrant women) couldn’t leave or steal. When a fire ignited, disaster struck. 146 people died that day. 


Omaha Beach, Normandy, France [1944]
Robert Capa
"If your pictures aren’t good enough," war photographer Robert Capa used to say, "you aren’t close enough." Words to die by, yes, but the man knew of what he spoke. After all, his most memorable shots were taken on the morning of D-Day, June 6, 1944, when he landed alongside the first waves of infantry at Omaha Beach.
Caught under heavy fire, Capa dove for what little cover he could find, then shot all the film in his camera, and got out – just barely. He escaped with his life, but not much else. Of the four rolls of film Capa took of the horrific D-Day battle, all but 11 exposures were ruined by an overeager lab assistant, who melted the film in his rush to develop it. (He was trying to meet the deadline for the next issue of Life magazine.)
In an ironic twist, however, that same mistake gave the few surviving exposures their famously surreal look ("slightly out of focus," Life incorrectly explained upon printing them). More than 50 years later, director Steven Spielberg would go to great lengths to reproduce the look of that "error" for his harrowing D-Day landing sequence in "Saving Private Ryan," even stripping the coating from his camera lenses to echo Capa’s notorious shots.

Murder of a Vietcong by Saigon Police Chief [1968]
Eddie Adams
 Still photographs are the most powerful weapon in the world," AP photojournalist Eddie Adams once wrote. A fitting quote for Adams, because his 1968 photograph of an officer shooting a handcuffed prisoner in the head at point-blank range not only earned him a Pulitzer Prize in 1969, but also went a long way toward souring Americans’ attitudes about the Vietnam War.
For all the image’s political impact, though, the situation wasn’t as black-and-white as it’s rendered. What Adams’ photograph doesn’t reveal is that the man being shot was the captain of a Vietcong "revenge squad" that had executed dozens of unarmed civilians earlier the same day. Regardless, it instantly became an icon of the war’s savagery and made the official pulling the trigger – General Nguyen Ngoc Loan – its iconic villain.
Sadly, the photograph’s legacy would haunt Loan for the rest of his life. Following the war, he was reviled where ever he went. After an Australian VA hospital refused to treat him, he was transferred to the United States, where he was met with a massive (though unsuccessful) campaign to deport him. He eventually settled in Virginia and opened a restaurant but was forced to close it down as soon as his past caught up with him. Vandals scrawled "we know who you are" on his walls, and business dried up.
Adams felt so bad for Loan that he apologized for having taken the photo at all, admitting, "The general killed the Vietcong; I killed the general with my camera.

Migrant Mother [1936]
Dorothea Lange 

As era-defining photographs go, "Migrant Mother" pretty much takes the cake. For many, Florence Owens Thompson is the face of the Great Depression, thanks to legendary shutterbug Dorothea Lange. Lange captured the image while visiting a dusty California pea-pickers’ camp in February 1936, and in doing so, captured the resilience of a proud nation facing desperate times.
Unbelievably, Thompson’s story is as compelling as her portrait. Just 32 years old when Lange approached her ("as if drawn by a magnet," Lange said). Thompson was a mother of seven who’d lost her husband to tuberculosis. Stranded at a migratory labor farm in Nipomo, Calif. her family sustained themselves on birds killed by her kids and vegetables taken from a nearby field – as meager a living as any earned by the other 2,500 workers there. The photo’s impact was staggering. Reproduced in newspapers everywhere, Thompson’s haunted face triggered an immediate public outcry, quickly prompting politicos from the federal Resettlement Administration to send food and supplies. Sadly, however, Thompson and her family had already moved on, receiving nary a wedge of government cheese for their high-profile misery. In fact, no one knew the identity of the photographed woman until Thompson revealed herself years later in a 1976 newspaper article.

Hindenburg [1937]
Murray Becker
Forget the Titanic, the Lusitania, and the comparatively unphotogenic accident at Chernobyl. Thanks to the power of images, the explosion of the Hindenburg on May 6, 1937, claims the dubious honor of being the quintessential disaster of the 20th century.
In the grand scheme of things, however, the Hindenburg wasn’t all that disastrous. Of the 97 people aboard, a surprising 62 survived. (in fact, it wasn’t even the worst Zeppelin crash of the 20th century. Just four years earlier, the U.S.S. Akron had crashed into the Atlantic killing more than twice as many people.) But when calculating the epic status of a catastrophe, terrifying photographs and quotable quotes ("Oh, the humanity!") far outweigh body counts.
Assembled as part of a massive PR campaign by the Hindenburg’s parent company in Germany, no fewer than 22 photographers, reporters, and newsreel cameramen were on the scene in Lakehurst, N.J. when the airship went down. Worldwide publicity of the well-documented disaster shattered the public’s faith in Zeppelins, which were, at the time, considered the safest mode of air travel available.
During the 1920s and 1930s, Zeppelins had operated regular flights, totting civilians back and forth between Germany and the Americas. But all of that stopped in 1937. The incident effectively killed the use of dirigibles as a commercially viable mode of passenger transport, ending the golden age of the airship not with a whimper, but with a horrific bang that was photographed and then syndicated around the globe.




The Tetons – Snake River [1942] 
Ansel Adams
Some claim photography can be divided into two eras: Before Adams and After Adams. In Times B.A., for instance, photography wasn’t widely considered an art form. Rather, photographers attempted to make their pictures more "artistic" (i.e., more like paintings) by subjecting their exposures to all sorts of extreme manipulations, from coating their lenses with petroleum jelly to scratching the surfaces of their negatives with needles. Then came Ansel Adams, helping shutterbugs everywhere get over their collective inferiority complex.
Brashly declaring photography to be "a blazing poetry of the real," Adams eschewed manipulations, claiming they were simply derivative of other art forms. Instead, he preached the value of "pure photography." In an era when handheld point-and-shoot cameras were quickly becoming the norm, Adams and other landscape photographers clung to their bulky, old-fashioned large-format cameras. Ultimately, Adams’ pictures turned photography into fine art. What’s more, they shaped the way Americans thought of their nation’s wilderness and, with that, how to preserve it.
Adams’ passion for the land wasn’t limited to vistas he framed through the lens. In 1936, he accompanied his photos to Washington to lobby for the preservation of the Kings Canyon area in California. Sure enough, he was successful, and it was declared a national park.

26 comments:

  1. amazing and powerfull

    ReplyDelete
  2. Kevin Carter's image made me feel physically sick that, that man could leave that poor child helpless. Disgusting...no wonder he killed himself...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. totally agree, photographers and wildlife photographers are told not to interfere in the natural 'cycle of life' but that was just in-human

      Delete
    2. He didn't let the kid die idiot... He helped him right after.

      Delete
    3. Kevin Carter was there momentarily and was warned not to touch the children as they can be carrying diseases. He was shipped off straight after.
      Us the public are the indifferent watchers as atrocious events and injustice go about. The refugee crisis for example. Carter captured the truth, WHAT ARE YOU DOING ?

      Delete
    4. Kevin Carter was there momentarily and was warned not to touch the children as they can be carrying diseases. He was shipped off straight after.
      Us the public are the indifferent watchers as atrocious events and injustice go about. The refugee crisis for example. Carter captured the truth, WHAT ARE YOU DOING ?

      Delete
  3. Don't make assumptions. Did the picture make YOU do something? Whether he did or didn't carry her to her inevitable death at the camp doesn't change the reality he brings to light or the opportunity he gives us to see, help, change.

    ReplyDelete
  4. What makes me sick, is the fact that you would condemn a noble and courageous man that showed the world the struggle of the Sudanese people

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are sick how can you say Kevin was a noble man.

      Delete
    2. What could he have done? I agree that he could have taken the child to the food, but at least now people know of the problem and obviously care now. The caption said it shocked people. That means people weren't aware before. And he suffered from depression afterwards.

      Delete
    3. GUYS! He was told not to touch any one beforehand due to the risk of many contagious diseases. I'm sure he would've have done it and I'm sure he was asking himself "Am I willing to risk my life for a stranger in desparate need?"
      Some say yes others say no. We all have different opinions. Carter was just following the rules, and it seems as though he regrets not helping the girl get to the food camp as we see that he committed suicide.

      Delete
  5. Kevin Carter was wrong what he did was inhuman he did himself justice.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. a photo is not exactly as it may appear it is the reality of the viewer how ever the viewer percieves it. it is also the creative work of the photographer meaning it is the photographers view and not neccesarily reality. the bottom line- a photo is not reality it is a perception of ones eyes and imagination. as for kevin carter killing himself-he had a selfless heart. it took courage to do what he did to place himself in danger and to alert others of the violence that was going on around him. he is a hero.

      Delete
  6. The caption supplied for the image here is incorrect. The vulture was not "waiting to eat him" - if you know about photography, you should know about depth of field and how objects can appear closer than they are.

    João Silva, a Portuguese photojournalist based in South Africa who accompanied Carter to Sudan, gave a different version of events in an interview with Japanese journalist and writer Akio Fujiwara that was published in Fujiwara's book The Boy who Became a Postcard.
    According to Silva, they (Carter and Silva) went to Sudan with the United Nations aboard Operation Lifeline Sudan and landed in Southern Sudan on March 11, 1993. The UN told them that they would take off again in 30 minutes (the time necessary to distribute food), so they ran around looking to take shots. The UN started to distribute corn and the women of the village came out of their wooden huts to meet the plane. Silva went looking for guerrilla fighters, while Carter strayed no more than a few dozen feet from the plane.
    Again according to Silva, Carter was quite shocked as it was the first time that he had seen a famine situation and so he took many shots of the children suffering from famine. Silva also started to take photos of children on the ground as if crying, which were not published. The parents of the children were busy taking food from the plane, so they had left their children only briefly while they collected the food. This was the situation for the girl in the photo taken by Carter. A vulture landed behind the girl. To get the two in focus, Carter approached the scene very slowly so as not to scare the vulture away and took a photo from approximately 10 metres. He took a few more photos before chasing the bird away.
    Two Spanish photographers who were in the same area at that time, José María Luis Arenzana and Luis Davilla, without knowing the photograph of Kevin Carter, took a picture in a similar situation. As recounted on several occasions, it was a feeding center, and the vultures came from a manure pit waste:
    "We took him and Pepe Arenzana to Ayod, where most of the time were in a feeding center where locals go. At one end of the enclosure, was a waste dump. As these children are so weak and malnourished they are going head giving the impression that they are dead. So if you grab a telephoto crush the child's perspective in the foreground and background and it seems that the vultures will eat it, but that's an absolute hoax, perhaps the animal is 20 meters."

    This account has been published in a number of books.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Kevin Carter's photos are amazing. My hat is off to people like Kevin; they are comparative to Fred Hollows. The world can see.

    ReplyDelete
  8. What about that shot of Michael Jackson hanging his kid over a balcony? Thought that was pretty famous.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Carter saw a lot of starving children that day. He flew in on an UN helicopter that was bringing food. The job of others was to distribute food. His job was to document the crisis. His photo did more for the people there than did that helicopter that day. To those who judge, I ask; what did you do for starvation today? Kevin Carter sacrificed his mind. Ultimately, he was no longer able to bear living his life. The world is not short of children starving today. If you are allowing them to starve, presumably it is because you haven't seen a particularly compelling photo of one today. Too bad Carter is gone.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Absolutely interesting! These photos substantially captures opens my mind and captures my heart. It speaks a message to all of us.

    Muslin Backdrops

    ReplyDelete
  11. Do you need Boston Corporate Photographers? Demetri Productions LLC consists of a small selective team of professional photographers and videographers. We provide on location Executive headshots or corporate portraits. No need to travel to our studio. We bring our lighting equipment along with neutral backdrops in white, gray or blue.

    ReplyDelete
  12. some of the best photos ever....nice work .....

    rgds,
    soham
    www.streetscape.in

    ReplyDelete
  13. marcb: I don't really see what the camera settings have to do with whether or not the vulture was waiting to eat the child, vultures can wait for something to die at any distance, Im sure you have also seen pictures of them circling hundreds of feet in the air ... waiting.
    How can people be judgemental on Kevin Carter, they have no idea of the life he lived or the things he saw during his career, its so easy to play the high morals from the comfort of a comfortable life ... I bet less than a day later after seeing his photograph most of you high moralists didn't give the starving another thought ...

    ReplyDelete
  14. I don't feel all that bad for the Saigon police chief - he shot a handcuffed prisoner at point blank range - that's a war crime. If his past caught up with him, its because he made a fateful decision to take his own illegal revenge on the leader of the revenge squad. The guy he killed was no prince, but it is abhorrent for a police officer to play judge, jury, and executioner (especially when his target is unarmed and helpless).

    ReplyDelete
  15. there's bunch more like this on http://histolines.com/index.php

    ReplyDelete
  16. "If Kevin Carter did nothing more in his short life than take this one photograph, of the emaciated child with the vulture in the background that raised public response to the starvation in Sudan, then he has done more than many of us put together in our much longer lives. It takes more than just courage to put one's self in the line of fire as Kevin Carter did, literally, (as did other war and crisis photographers/ correspondents) to take these photographs. It is very sad that, in the case of this photograph, because of the vulture** his morals were questioned and his reputation sullied. If he lacked morals he would have been insensitive to the inhumane atrocities he encountered and not photographed any of the pictures that he did. His photographs speak for his morals and has provided the world with visual records of what he saw. His experiences in the field did not desensitize him, rather it would have disturbed him as much as it did us. A disturbed mind, from my experience, when not in a position to do anything about what is beyond jurisdiction, is depressing. I think, this state of mind aggravated by the questions of his morals resulted in suicide. His suicide would not have been out of guilt, but out of awareness for what we as humans can inflict on each other. Are we so insensitive that we cannot understand what depression is, what causes it and what it's consequence are? We cannot and should not draw conclusions, about his morals or without understanding his state mind, unless we have walked at least a mile in his shoes. The fact that this picture continues to speak to us means the message it portrays has instilled itself in our social consciousness, and will remain there for many more generations. Instead of judging him and photographers like him, we should be grateful that they continue providing us with visuals that push us to do something about it. They did.
    ** Food for thought: replace the vulture with a person pointing a weapon - would photographer's morals be questioned or would he be praised and applauded for recording and exposing the morals of the weapon-toting individual! " comment copyrights SJ Moodley (11/07/2014)

    ReplyDelete
  17. Kevin Carter was beaten up by fellow soldiers for defending a black guy getting hassled by fellow soldiers. He chased the vulture away after taking the photo. What would you have him do - take all the starving kids with him on the plane?

    ReplyDelete